|
|
12-06-2007, 07:35 PM | #1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 69
Likes: 2
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
1982-92 camaro
who makes the best sub frame connectors weld in or bolt in? also roll bar and 12 bolt rear?
|
12-06-2007, 08:17 PM | #2 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Cedar Run, NJ
Posts: 38
Likes: 796
Liked 10 Times in 3 Posts
|
Re: 1982-92 camaro
S&W for frame, torque arm and roll bar. Strange for rear. You can't go wrong.
Rich G-H/S 86 camaro |
12-07-2007, 02:41 AM | #3 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: jackson
Posts: 1,165
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 3 Posts
|
Re: 1982-92 camaro
2nd that ..if ya want "the best"!
__________________
Greg Fulk 308 308X P/SA "ALL AMERICAN" |
12-31-2007, 12:47 PM | #4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Rowlett, Texas
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: 1982-92 camaro
|
12-31-2007, 05:43 PM | #5 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: 1982-92 camaro
Go to there web site www.swracecars.com
|
12-31-2007, 10:54 PM | #6 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: 1982-92 camaro
Get the S&W torque arm but make you own subframe connectors and crossmember out of 2x2. Everybody's running S&W but I've see some of the round tubing flex.
|
12-15-2008, 09:41 PM | #7 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Woodlawn IL
Posts: 1,093
Likes: 162
Liked 220 Times in 79 Posts
|
Re: 1982-92 camaro
Quote:
Thanks in advance Rob |
|
12-16-2008, 12:18 AM | #8 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: 1982-92 camaro
I've seen some pictures of the round tube stuff bent under stress. This is on cars that run the tubing from side to side w/o bracing it. You can use the round crossmenber but, I would brace it up against the floorboard. The S&W stuff is the best and that is what most Camaro/Firebirds out there are using. I bought the S&W torque but built my subfram connectors and the torque arm crossmember out of 2x2 mild steel. If you build you own just make sure that it can move fore and aft. I also designed a front mount with 3 holes in it for adjustability. Sorry for the fuzzy picture but you can get an idea.
|
12-16-2008, 08:05 AM | #9 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: League City, Texas
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: 1982-92 camaro
My wife and me are trying to sell a S&W kit for a 93-02. This is some first class stuff. We just don't need it anymore or it wouldn't be for sale. They have their whole kit on sale right now from what I understand.
__________________
Next time wave all of your fingers at me. |
12-16-2008, 11:29 AM | #10 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Liberty City [East Texas]
Posts: 1,759
Likes: 5
Liked 99 Times in 60 Posts
|
Re: 1982-92 camaro
I am unsettled about a torque arm front pivot design. Even after talking with S & W plus other racers, I still am not satisfied that a "poly" bushing at the front pivot is best.
I keep having this thought, "when installing ladder bars or four link, we use rod ends, not poly bushings. Why should this application be treated differently?" [of course, it is understood about the need for a pivoting shackle] I know that other designs are on the market that do not use a poly bushing. Again, this is my thought, I like the design that uses a large, solid aluminum bushing. Here is an example of that design. http://www.wolferacecraft.com/images...arm/fbtq43.jpg [this design has two aluminum bushings, one in the bar and one in the shackle pivot. Both have grease fittings] Also, I think it is very important for the torque arm crossmember to be very stable. As in the above post, it needs to be tight up against the floor and welded/braced in several spots. I also agree with the above post about using 2" x 2" tubing custom fitted for frame connectors, well braced/attached in several sports. I am interested in the thoughts of others in ref to poly bushing or "other"
__________________
Larry Woodfin 471W |
|
|