|
|
07-02-2008, 07:12 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
|
Nhra shortens t/f and f/c race to 1000 ft.
__________________
The Doughboy Lee Lones S/ST 323L |
07-02-2008, 07:24 PM | #2 |
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Nhra shortens t/f and f/c race to 1000 ft.
wow
|
07-02-2008, 08:32 PM | #3 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Northern New Jersey suburbs
Posts: 2,306
Likes: 25
Liked 537 Times in 211 Posts
|
Re: Nhra shortens t/f and f/c race to 1000 ft.
Thumbs up to NHRA for taking an action quickly on this. T/F's and F/C's are TOO FAST and making too much power. 3 F/C crashes in 15 months and 2 tragic deaths. Dragsters have broken in half.....tires exploding and we should not forget the death of Darrel Russell. I am a huge Nascar fan and have been for many years....some of my favorite people were killed.....and sadly my biggest idol in all of motorsport Dale Earnhardt.Nascar said we have to stop this and they did....NHRA has to stop this as best as they can and NOW not later.....1000' racing will cut speeds and hopefully will cut engine explosions and tire issues as well.......Fans will still come to see them.....It will just take a little getting used to the numbers.....
__________________
Rich Biebel S/C 1479 Stock 147R |
07-02-2008, 08:46 PM | #4 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Loudonville, Ohio or where ever the Nitro Lounge is parked
Posts: 2,293
Likes: 44
Liked 67 Times in 19 Posts
|
Re: Nhra shortens t/f and f/c race to 1000 ft.
"Do it in style on a 5th of a mile"
make Funny cars look like funny cars again, not bat mobiles take the big *** wing away from both so they both have to de tune to get them from A-B |
07-02-2008, 08:55 PM | #5 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: NEW JERSEY
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Nhra shortens t/f and f/c race to 1000 ft.
Hats off to n.h.r.a........................................its a big start in the right direction............
|
07-02-2008, 09:05 PM | #6 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Nhra shortens t/f and f/c race to 1000 ft.
Quote:
|
|
07-02-2008, 10:27 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
|
Re: Nhra shortens t/f and f/c race to 1000 ft.
I think this is a great thing.... it will now make the driver and not the tuner win races. You better be on the tree cause you just lost 320ft. of track to catch up.
They will have to add a speed trap at 1000 ft.now too. I know there are a lot of people not happy with this, but i know this is a step in the right direction.
__________________
The Doughboy Lee Lones S/ST 323L |
07-02-2008, 11:27 PM | #8 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Texarkana Ark/TX
Posts: 2,396
Likes: 492
Liked 724 Times in 280 Posts
|
Re: Nhra shortens t/f and f/c race to 1000 ft.
Quote:
__________________
Adger Smith (Former SS) |
|
07-07-2008, 10:50 PM | #9 |
Member
|
Re: Nhra shortens t/f and f/c race to 1000 ft.
All racers know that if you shorten the track to 1000 feet, then I need to get to 1000 feet ASAP! So I'll make the engine run to 990 feet or so, same ending. Not gonna change Jack Squat. But less than 2 weeks after Scott K dies, Von Smith darn near hit a tree in the shut down at Norwalk. (They cut it down after). 1. Clear the shut downs of all obstructions. 2. Make all cars carry a device that can be controled by someone outside the car that a. deploys the chuts, b. turn on the fire bottles, c. shuts off the fuel. NHRA could have a person at 1000 or 660 to set this RF signal off in the event of a massive explosion. The people are already there. This combined with CLEAR AMPLE SHUT DOWNS is the answer, we already have fans bewildered by all the classes. Lets not toss in a distance change to boot.
__________________
Jeff Beckman 318J ET, SG 318T SC |
07-08-2008, 02:49 AM | #10 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Nhra shortens t/f and f/c race to 1000 ft.
Quote:
This is a change that may or may not be temporary. It will be in place for the rest of this season. It was the one thing that they could do that wouldn't have immediate significant financial impacts on both the teams and the tracks. Remote shut off of some systems and activation of others is definitely worth looking into. Measures to slow the cars down is too, but they shouldn't be measures that will cause even more engine carnage than there is now, or reduce the likelihood of side-by-side racing because the changes render the cars more prone to getting out of shape and/or losing traction. The end of the racing surface most certainly needs to be addressed at many tracks. How it is addressed differs from track to track due to the availability or unavailability of real estate to expand it. None of them should serve as launch pads producing airborne race cars. They should all have real sand traps. There should be nothing to run into other than catch nets, and there should be multiple catch nets at every national event track. While there are no absolute guarantees that any of these changes will prevent another driver from dying in a racing accident, they could well go a long way toward reducing the number of funerals the sport has experienced in the last few years. Some folks don't watch or care about some classes of drag racing, and that's fine. I watch and care about them all. When too many people die doing something, the companies that insure the activity stop doing so - see rocket cars in the USA and class B rally cars world wide. I think it is far better to do this (move the finish line) now, and spend some time looking at other remedies to prevent potential catastrophes than to lose more lives and the ability to contest the sport at all. |
|
|
|