HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock Tech
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-29-2012, 11:49 AM   #1
art leong
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Richmond Hill, Georgia
Posts: 2,003
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Rim width?

I see almost everybody runs a rim slightly wider than the slick.
I haven't tried a rim wider but with my style tires the narrower rim (6" rim 8" wide tire) Does not grow nearly as much as an 8" rim 8 " tire
My therory is that the narrower rim pulls in the sidewall (very little sidewall on my tires 3" at most) and stops or retards growth at higher rpms.
Going to have a pair of wheels made (for 8" wide tires) and was thinking about a 9" width
What are the pros and cons of a wider wheel?
__________________
Art Leong 2095 SS
art leong is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2012, 12:22 PM   #2
Ed Wright
Veteran Member
 
Ed Wright's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
Default Re: Rim width?

Art, most automatic trans cars use radials which don't grow anyway. Are you using bias tires? Back in the '70s I first started using wider wheels on Firestone 10.5" bias (all we had then) tires on my C/SM Camaro. It hooked harder and ran quicker with more air, same as my car does now with radials.

Seems like they grew less? I'm very old, so may not remember it correctly. :-(
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA
Ed Wright is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2012, 01:05 PM   #3
Run to Rund
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Henderson, NV
Posts: 583
Likes: 8
Liked 54 Times in 27 Posts
Default Re: Rim width?

I asked a similar question of Hoosier regarding their 30x9 bias ply slicks. Combined with my limited experience using 8" and 10" wheels with them, it seems that they grow more with the 8" wheel, and section width is about .8" less. The sidewall seems to work harder and wrinkle more with 8". I am told you can run the pressure up from 11 lb. to 13 lb. with the bigger wheel, but haven't tried it yet. Performance is similar and Hoosier confirmed that on slower cars there won't be much difference. That was confirmed by a former holder of the D/S record, who used up to13 lb.

I just bought a new pair, and got 9" wheels for them. My hope is that the sidewalls will be happy and I will get the best of the growth vs. footprint vs. section width. It is not as expensive for me to test as I use 20 lb. Marsh racing wheels (steel) for a nostalgia look/car. [I get them with centers for 5/8" studs, 45 deg. lug nuts such as ARP sells].
Run to Rund is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2012, 07:48 PM   #4
art leong
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Richmond Hill, Georgia
Posts: 2,003
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: Rim width?

I'm going to buy a pair of Diamond Racing Spun Wheels for my circle track 13 x 8 x 20 tires I can get the backspacing I need and they are only 14 pounds each.
I wish I could use a radial tire. But I have to be happy to even have a biased ply that is 20" tall.
If I go taller I kill the car at least .15 and 2 mph. Which is fine in protect mode
I've tried ABA testing of 6 inch rims and 8 inch rims and the 6 inch cross the finish at least 200 rpms higher. So the narrower rim (in my case) grows a lot less.
These are not ordinary slicks there is almost no sidewall (3 inches).
__________________
Art Leong 2095 SS

Last edited by art leong; 12-29-2012 at 07:52 PM.
art leong is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.