|
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
I have always been amazed at the amount of horsepower Stock Eliminator racers have been able to extract from their cars. I would think that the engines must be extremely efficient, squeezing the last bit of hp from every drop of fuel.
My question is, what do you guys do to the engines to make them run so strong on seemingly mundane parts? I realize some basics like fully balanced rotating assembly and cc' ing the heads would help, but what else? I'd like to apply some of the things to my street engine when I rebuild it. Thanks, Dan |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Last edited by X-TECH MAN; 01-31-2011 at 10:34 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 820
Likes: 9
Liked 132 Times in 30 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
I was talking to another racer yesterday about the very same subject. Too many racers looking to go fast fail to look at the most basic areas. I'm sure there will be others that chime in on this subject and should offer some interesting answers.
__________________
Gary Smith "another broke racer spectating" |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Richmond Hill GA (and Port Ludlow WA)
Posts: 4,296
Likes: 2,383
Liked 3,181 Times in 972 Posts
|
![]()
X-TECH MAN is right on, for the street it's hard to beat stroker motors that remain pump gas friendly. Correct clearances, file your ring end gaps, etc. are essential and let a good shop bore/hone your block. Also, given the tighter convertors (you do NOT want a "stocker" convertor on the street any more than you want 5:13's) cam selection is absolutely critical. Don't catalog shop, talk to one of the reputable cam makers and tailor the cam to your combo. Finally, get all the weight out of your car that's practical, it pays dividends in every area of car performance.
P.S. Crate motors are a pretty good deal but again selection is key and cubic inches rule. If you decide to go crate motor then start a new thread soliciting feedback, there is a wealth of knowledge on this forum. Also helpful to indicate your current car/motor. Every make has it's own following.
__________________
Jim Carter 2340 Super Stock 2340 SST/2340 Stock Set another place at the table |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 820
Likes: 9
Liked 132 Times in 30 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Gary Smith "another broke racer spectating" |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,116
Likes: 1,573
Liked 1,829 Times in 414 Posts
|
![]()
What few people understand is that most Stock Eliminator cars are not fast just because of the engine. It's the entire car, and all the tuning and work that goes with it. The engine is important, don't get me wrong.
Most people can't take around 600HP in a 3300# car and run 9.90 with it in good air.
__________________
Alan Roehrich 212A G/S |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Thanks so much for the responses! I feel I understand the class a little better now, much more going on behind the scenes than I realized. There is definately a lot more to it than a common weekend bracket car.
Some of the things that I'm planning for my motor are; 1.) balance the rotating assembly 2.) cc the heads 3.) port the heads, working to improve flow and velocity instead of just hogging out the ports. 4.) keeping the stock size valves or maybe a slight increase, again for velocity. 5.) 3 angle valve job 6.) match port everything 7.) keeping the stock carb (maybe??? don't know yet) 8.) headers, small tube 9.) stock compression Just trying to make it the most efficient, make decent power without killing gas mileage. What do you think? Am I on the right track? Missing anything obvious? A few questions, though. Does an increase in overlap work the same as higher lift on the cam. If it does, I guess you guys are limited on your lift, so you acomplish the same thing with overlap. Am I kind of right or COMPLETELY wrong? Also, does an increase benefit torque or top end? Again, thanks for everybodys patience with a new guy. Dan |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Live Reporter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hickory, Ky
Posts: 10,640
Likes: 1,940
Liked 10,714 Times in 2,230 Posts
|
![]()
Dan you can do all of your list and pick up power, remember hard smart work is what it takes. OR.....................
You can do what Mr. Bill did and get Shelby to change all the spec. 20 years later. Most S/SS racers work very hard to use the power they make to turn the wheels. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,116
Likes: 1,573
Liked 1,829 Times in 414 Posts
|
![]()
Dan,
Stock cams not only have a lot more duration and overlap than you'd want, but also a lot more aggressive lobe profile than you'd want in a street flat tappet cam. Attention to detail is what makes Stock engines run. Honestly, using a set of aftermarket heads with modern ports and combustion chambers will get you years ahead of what we're working with to make these older heaps go fast. The same thing with pistons, more efficient dish/dome profiles, better skirts, and better ring packages will be a lot cheaper and work better than what we run. What you need to take away from the typical Stock program is the attention to detail and the blueprinting that allows us to make the most of the limited stuff we have. The use of torque plates, the perfect hone finish, the blueprinted locations of the deck, the main bearing bores, the lifter bores, the cylinder bores, and the exacting tolerances and clearances.
__________________
Alan Roehrich 212A G/S |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: West Monroe, La.
Posts: 301
Likes: 9
Liked 13 Times in 7 Posts
|
![]()
Good answer, Alan
__________________
Richard Grant 4988 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|