|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: California, Ky
Posts: 669
Likes: 61
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
![]()
Hello All,
I was just wondering if you guys could shine some light on this subject for me. I've been noticing lately that alot of the lower class cars D thru K or so are actually using a roll cage when its not really needed per the ET breaks. I'm guessing the cage stiffens up the chassis and could prove better 60' times. Is there a proven advantage in the 60' or something?
__________________
Kris Rachford 69 Cobra 428CJ 4 Speed C/S 3032 Last edited by 69Cobra; 10-04-2011 at 05:30 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Jacksonville, Florida
Posts: 808
Likes: 7
Liked 20 Times in 12 Posts
|
![]()
It does stiffen things up. Some of the cars cross over to super stock in a class that required a cage. But me, I am looking to put one in my stocker because of the increasing speed differences. 145mph plus? vs my 110mph I just see it as safety. I would like to hear what the weight difference has been from a mild steel roll bar vs. a chrome moly roll cage? No front bars of course.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Bellevue Ohio
Posts: 984
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times in 8 Posts
|
![]()
3 years ago took out a 6 point MS roll bar, installed an 8 point CM roll cage Aprox. 20 Lbs. lighter even after adding more tubes. This is just my opinion but given the choice I see no reason not to go with CM, yes it's more expensive and requires tig welding but think back to the first question anyone asks' when looking at a car.... "is it MS or CM?" On a full cage and frame the weight savings are substantial.
__________________
Joe Buchanan SS/BX 3117 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]()
Don't forget that when you use a CM cage instead of a 6 point MS roll bar the tubes can be a smaller diameter and thinner wall which saves some weight in the overall installation. Consult with a chassis builder for specifics but the weight savings is pretty significant since several CM tubes in the cage can be less than 1/2 the required wall thickness of MS. As buzzinhalfdozen points out his CM cage was lighter than his MS roll bar. Generally speaking a properly sized 10 point CM cage weighs about the same (within 10 lbs) as a 6 point MS roll bar!!!
Last edited by Jim B; 10-04-2011 at 04:11 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Anthem, Arizona
Posts: 2,766
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]()
CM is the way to go. Lighter. Stronger. And CM doesn't rust!
My mistake when I built my CM roll bar for Stock class was not using a drivers side rocker bar. I thought the fact I had a CM bar everything would be fine. When I switched to SS class, I had the roll bar converted to a roll-cage. Still no rocker bar. In the end, somewhere along the way, the (slightly) rusty floor separated from the rocker, causing chassis problems. Now I'm building a complete back-half (CM) with 4-link. I may not have gone this route had the chassis remained true.
__________________
Jeff Lee 7494 D/S '70 AMX |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Yuba City, CA
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
I am finishing up an 8,50 cert CM cage in my K/.S car. Added safety, lighter than a MS roll bar and room to grow/move up!
__________________
Shawn Allsup K/S 718 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: lagrange,nc
Posts: 2,224
Likes: 1
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Danny Waters, Sr / 73 Duster "340" |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|