HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock Tech
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-10-2015, 02:06 PM   #1
njk53
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: East China, MI
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default 350 - 270 Combo Horsepower

My brother and I have been tossing around the idea of going from the BBC 402-300 combo we currently have in our car to a 350-270 combo. My question is, can anyone who has run this combination in the past, give me a ballpark horsepower and torque numbers this combination has the potential to make?

We currently run the BBC 402-300 combo.
__________________
Nelson Kowal
Stock 345
njk53 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2015, 05:49 PM   #2
Jim Hanig
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Pukwana SD
Posts: 860
Likes: 554
Liked 99 Times in 49 Posts
Default Re: 350 - 270 Combo Horsepower

Needs to make north of 400 hp put you .06 to 07 under.
Jim Hanig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2015, 08:21 AM   #3
njk53
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: East China, MI
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: 350 - 270 Combo Horsepower

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim Hanig View Post
Needs to make north of 400 hp put you .06 to 07 under.
I would agree with your comment but, I need some advice from someone who has ran or has built the 350-270 combo to get an idea in regard to horsepower/torque numbers to help us decide whether or not it is going to be a worthwhile combination to build. We will be starting from scratch if we choose to go the 350-270 route.
__________________
Nelson Kowal
Stock 345
njk53 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2015, 07:50 PM   #4
rick winchester
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: cincinnati ohio
Posts: 208
Likes: 291
Liked 195 Times in 33 Posts
Default Re: 350 - 270 Combo Horsepower

Contact Ron Matson and Bruce Noland. They have had good success with this combo and I think they both have some real good parts for sale after moving to another class and engine combo.
__________________
Rick Winchester Stk 3277
rick winchester is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2015, 11:45 PM   #5
Jim Hanig
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Pukwana SD
Posts: 860
Likes: 554
Liked 99 Times in 49 Posts
Default Re: 350 - 270 Combo Horsepower

Quote:
Originally Posted by njk53 View Post
I would agree with your comment but, I need some advice from someone who has ran or has built the 350-270 combo to get an idea in regard to horsepower/torque numbers to help us decide whether or not it is going to be a worthwhile combination to build. We will be starting from scratch if we choose to go the 350-270 route.
I have worked on several in my 15 plus years , But go ahead .
Jim Hanig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2015, 08:25 PM   #6
gsa612
Senior Member
 
gsa612's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: 100th Meridian
Posts: 569
Likes: 116
Liked 280 Times in 139 Posts
Default Re: 350 - 270 Combo Horsepower

How fast have you gone with the the 402 this time around?.Has it been on a dyno?. gsa612
gsa612 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2015, 10:27 PM   #7
rick winchester
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: cincinnati ohio
Posts: 208
Likes: 291
Liked 195 Times in 33 Posts
Default Re: 350 - 270 Combo Horsepower

I hate to get into a pi%%ing contest on which engine is better . that being said anyone who thinks a 402/315 is better than a 350/270 is mistaken. If I am wrong someone needs to notify Demarzo,Johnny Gray and Sepanek so they will quit wasting their money and time running them. This is just one guys opinion ,I can say that the 402/315 is way to high. 280 to 285 would be a lot closer in stock. SuperStock is a different story. Oh by the way I run the 350/270 @278 not 270. Rick.
__________________
Rick Winchester Stk 3277

Last edited by rick winchester; 06-13-2015 at 09:15 AM. Reason: spelling
rick winchester is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2015, 11:10 AM   #8
Joe DeMarzo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Mahopac, NY
Posts: 666
Likes: 48
Liked 113 Times in 9 Posts
Default Re: 350 - 270 Combo Horsepower

Rick & Jim are dead on. The 350/270 rated 278 is a better combo. I had a 402 big block in my nova and researched a number of combo's and Johnny Gray gave me the best insights. What is nice is that a lot of racers run the combo (HP avg) and we share information on what works and doesn't. Rick I think you should move to D-1 (lol) and we can learn from each other. . It is not all about HP but torg, converter, carb, and suspension. Good luck with your choice njk53.

By the by Gray, Sepanek and I all have different engine builders.
__________________
Joe DeMarzo 1317 STK

Last edited by Joe DeMarzo; 06-14-2015 at 11:12 AM. Reason: update
Joe DeMarzo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2015, 05:13 PM   #9
rick winchester
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: cincinnati ohio
Posts: 208
Likes: 291
Liked 195 Times in 33 Posts
Default Re: 350 - 270 Combo Horsepower

Joe, I would love to come east and race someday,but from what I hear about the taxes up there I could not afford to live anywhere near the east coast. As for sharing info I really don't think you want to slow down ?lol. Hope to meet you someday,maybe at the nationals.If you are ever near Cincinnati look me up. Take care. Rick. ps You are right ,Johnny knows his stuff and the Sepaneks are damn fast when it counts.
__________________
Rick Winchester Stk 3277
rick winchester is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2015, 08:34 AM   #10
njk53
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: East China, MI
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: 350 - 270 Combo Horsepower

Quote:
Originally Posted by rick winchester View Post
I hate to get into a pi%%ing contest on which engine is better . that being said anyone who thinks a 402/315 is better than a 350/270 is mistaken. If I am wrong someone needs to notify Demarzo,Johnny Gray and Sepanek so they will quit wasting their money and time running them. This is just one guys opinion ,I can say that the 402/315 is way to high. 280 to 285 would be a lot closer in stock. SuperStock is a different story. Oh by the way I run the 350/270 @278 not 270. Rick.
Rick, when you say the 402-315 is way too high do you mean the NRHA factored horsepower as being way too high? If so I agree. We have asked the NHRA for a HP reduction for our combo but no dice. I hate to admit it I raced another K/SA car heads up at Norwalk a few weeks ago and he just walked all over me, it was that bad. I have had a couple of engine builders that stated the 402-300-315 engine combo wouldn't be their first choice. If you guys out there knows of anyone successfully running the 402-300-315 combination, I would sure like to speak to them for advise. Maybe we are doing something wrong, I don't know. I feel our car is just too heavy for the power it makes.
__________________
Nelson Kowal
Stock 345

Last edited by njk53; 06-16-2015 at 08:37 AM.
njk53 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.