HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock Tech
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-04-2014, 04:07 PM   #1
GallopinGhost
Member
 
GallopinGhost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: VA
Posts: 230
Likes: 23
Liked 21 Times in 13 Posts
Default Challenger Stocker front suspension advice

Building a 1970 challenger and working on front suspension, and would appreciate some advice. First the old direct connection books recommend an .840" dia torsion bar, which as far as I can tell isn' t made anymore, or if it is, it's pricy. I'm considering turning down my originals to that diameter. I can't think why that wouldn't work. Thoughts ? Question 2, strut rod bushings. I've read the previous posts on it, and I didn't see a consensus on bushing/bearing. I'm looking for a good working suspension, not the most expensive solution. I do all my own work and can fab most anything. Thanks in advance.

Brian
__________________
Brian Carpenter
Stock 1358
GallopinGhost is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2014, 06:26 PM   #2
426Fred
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Sewell, New Jersey
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default Re: Challenger Stocker front suspension advice

Contact Firm Feel

http://www.firmfeel.com/b_body_mopar_torsion_bars.html

They make an .820 drag racing torsion bar. If they are a little pricy then look for a 6 cylinder bar for an e-body. I don't think it would be a good idea to turn down a torsion bar. You would ruin the integrity of the properties of the bar itself and it would probably snap under load like coming down from a wheel stand. Just my two cents.
__________________
Fred Palumbo
1025 STK
426Fred is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2014, 06:47 PM   #3
Toddwell
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 21
Likes: 1
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Challenger Stocker front suspension advice

B and E body, same torsion bar...B-body might be easier to find with a slant 6
Toddwell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2014, 07:57 PM   #4
Greg Hill
VIP Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Louisville , KY
Posts: 1,995
Likes: 68
Liked 279 Times in 68 Posts
Default Re: Challenger Stocker front suspension advice

Larry Hill posts on here all the time. He has a 70 Cuda that works pretty well. Send him a pm, he might be able to help.
__________________
Greg Hill 4171 STK
Greg Hill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2014, 08:17 PM   #5
GallopinGhost
Member
 
GallopinGhost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: VA
Posts: 230
Likes: 23
Liked 21 Times in 13 Posts
Default Re: Challenger Stocker front suspension advice

Thanks all for the tips, I'll PM Larry. Any other ideas, please post or send a PM. thanks
__________________
Brian Carpenter
Stock 1358
GallopinGhost is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2014, 10:55 PM   #6
Larry Hill
Live Reporter
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hickory, Ky
Posts: 10,629
Likes: 1,922
Liked 10,681 Times in 2,222 Posts
Default Re: Challenger Stocker front suspension advice

What combination do you plan to run. Weight will determine how much stored energy you will need to transfer the weight to the rear tires.
__________________
IHM Used Parts
https://ihmusedparts.com
888-821-1817
Larry Hill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2014, 05:25 AM   #7
GallopinGhost
Member
 
GallopinGhost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: VA
Posts: 230
Likes: 23
Liked 21 Times in 13 Posts
Default Re: Challenger Stocker front suspension advice

Plan is to run the 383/335
__________________
Brian Carpenter
Stock 1358
GallopinGhost is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2014, 07:36 AM   #8
Larry Hill
Live Reporter
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hickory, Ky
Posts: 10,629
Likes: 1,922
Liked 10,681 Times in 2,222 Posts
Default Re: Challenger Stocker front suspension advice

What class?
__________________
IHM Used Parts
https://ihmusedparts.com
888-821-1817
Larry Hill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2014, 08:05 AM   #9
Jim B
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: Challenger Stocker front suspension advice

Back in the day Ed Hamburger's team cars had the torsion bar diameter ground down in increments and track tested to fine tune the spring rate. I remember a very generous radius in the hex to bar diameter area when lower class cars were involved. I wouldn't think a 383 combo with todays rear suspension technology would be in this category. I'd be pretty sure with 4 wheel scale numbers and feedback from this forum you could get a stock bar that's pretty close to what you need. Don't forget there's left and right....Reversing the side can end up with a bar snapping at unopportune times. The 3 digit number at the end of the bar is even for right and odd for left. (ie, 774 is right and 775 is left.....780 is right and 781 is left, etc.) The bars are thicker as the paired number increases.

Last edited by Jim B; 08-05-2014 at 08:22 AM.
Jim B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2014, 08:28 AM   #10
GallopinGhost
Member
 
GallopinGhost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: VA
Posts: 230
Likes: 23
Liked 21 Times in 13 Posts
Default Re: Challenger Stocker front suspension advice

From what I've seen, it's a natural F car. The T bars that came with the car are .940", it's a factory 383 car. The car is being painted now and I want to get the front suspension done and installed on the k-member while that's happening. I guess the bars can wait a while.

Jim, thanks for that info
__________________
Brian Carpenter
Stock 1358

Last edited by GallopinGhost; 08-05-2014 at 08:48 AM.
GallopinGhost is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.