|
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Jacksonville, NC
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
I see there are 5 options available for this motor.
Casting #s 3918903 3860384 3905393 3872783 3875954 Anybody know which is the best application for sbc |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 263
Likes: 269
Liked 53 Times in 17 Posts
|
![]()
What car? Year? Hp ?, are you doing?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Jacksonville, NC
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
68 Camaro 350/295hp, D,E or F/S
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Arkansas - In the middle of everything.
Posts: 1,999
Likes: 64
Liked 772 Times in 192 Posts
|
![]()
The best one will likely be the lightest one.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Glendora,Calif.
Posts: 1,135
Likes: 172
Liked 704 Times in 218 Posts
|
![]()
Hi. I did a little research,since I have a '68 Chevelle 327 car.
Intake#1 should be #3919803. That's the OEM intake for the 327 250,275,and 325 horse, as well as the 350/295. Intake # 2,#3860384, appears to be a service replacement part. Intake#3,#3905393,is an OEM '67 327 intake. Intake#4,#3872783 is anOEM '66 327 intake. Intake#5,#3875954 appears to be another service replacement intake. As far as which one is best, there probably aren't much different if at all.After they get matched to ypur motor, any one of them probably would work. The 393 and the 803 seem to be the easiest to find. Best wishes on your project!! . |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Jacksonville, NC
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Thanks for the help.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cumming GA
Posts: 1,988
Likes: 1,281
Liked 1,428 Times in 296 Posts
|
![]()
The 783 intake is for a very small Holley that was offered on the 275 hp 327.
I think even smaller than the 585 cfm one on the L79. I didn't know that was on the 295 hp 350, but I don't think it would be the preferred option.
__________________
James Schaechter 3163 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Potomac,IL
Posts: 278
Likes: 1
Liked 66 Times in 22 Posts
|
![]()
Dwight is correct.
I have ran both the 803 and the 393, there is no difference in the two. I would just leave it outside all winter then install LOL.
__________________
Monte Howard 3209 STK, 3208 SS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Glendora,Calif.
Posts: 1,135
Likes: 172
Liked 704 Times in 218 Posts
|
![]()
Seems that in 66, the QJ and the Holley intake had the same number.A Carter AFB was also in use that year.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cumming GA
Posts: 1,988
Likes: 1,281
Liked 1,428 Times in 296 Posts
|
![]()
There is something amiss with that.Maybe the guide is incorrect. I have the Q jet and Holley manifolds. A Qjet won't fit on the Holley one. I think an AVS uses the Holley ( 783) one too.
__________________
James Schaechter 3163 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|