HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock Tech
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-30-2011, 08:53 PM   #1
BobUnkefer
Member
 
BobUnkefer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default 1st gen Camaro bushings

Danged if I can find the thread that's in here somewhere on the best setup for front end bushings for 67-69 Camaro's.
Do remember that the general opinion was to stay away from poly bushings. But don't remember what/who had the best pieces.

Would like to redo the front end on my '68 and looking for input.

Appreciate your feedback
Unk
__________________
Bob Unkefer 4409 STK

Last edited by BobUnkefer; 03-30-2011 at 09:00 PM.
BobUnkefer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2011, 10:05 PM   #2
Alan Roehrich
Veteran Member
 
Alan Roehrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,113
Likes: 1,571
Liked 1,827 Times in 414 Posts
Default Re: 1st gen Camaro bushings

Bob, Del-A-Lum, from Global West, for the bushings, TRW or Moog for upper control arm shafts, and TRW or Howe for the extended upper ball joints.
__________________
Alan Roehrich
212A G/S
Alan Roehrich is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2011, 10:22 PM   #3
BobUnkefer
Member
 
BobUnkefer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: 1st gen Camaro bushings

Alan,
I've looked at the Del-A-Lum bushings, do I need the offset shaft? or is the TRW Moog shaft all that's needed, and why not the offset shaft?

Appreciate the reply, thanks.

Unk
__________________
Bob Unkefer 4409 STK
BobUnkefer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2011, 11:45 PM   #4
Mark Yacavone
Veteran Member
 
Mark Yacavone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,815
Likes: 2,904
Liked 5,121 Times in 1,952 Posts
Default Re: 1st gen Camaro bushings

Bob , The offset shafts should give you a few more degrees + caster without too much - camber (by using more alignment shims on the rear bolt)
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers
Mark Yacavone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2011, 12:33 AM   #5
B Aceves
Member
 
B Aceves's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 457
Likes: 1
Liked 7 Times in 4 Posts
Default Re: 1st gen Camaro bushings

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Roehrich View Post
Bob, Del-A-Lum, from Global West, for the bushings, TRW or Moog for upper control arm shafts, and TRW or Howe for the extended upper ball joints.
Alan, im just wondering what do you find to gain by using a extended upper Ball joint on the
front of a Camaro ?
__________________
Bob Aceves,
746 E/SA
A&M motorsports
B Aceves is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2011, 11:12 AM   #6
Alan Roehrich
Veteran Member
 
Alan Roehrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,113
Likes: 1,571
Liked 1,827 Times in 414 Posts
Default Re: 1st gen Camaro bushings

I like the offset upper shafts to get a better range of adjustment for caster and camber. I like to see zero camber at race height, going down the track, with a lot of caster so the car wants to go straight and keep going straight, with minimal rolling resistance. If you can get plenty of caster, you can run as close to possible to actual zero toe, without wandering.

The extended upper ball joints help to correct the camber curve, so that the amount of camber change during front end travel is reduced.
__________________
Alan Roehrich
212A G/S
Alan Roehrich is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2011, 11:17 AM   #7
Greg Barsamian
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Central Massachusetts
Posts: 1,400
Likes: 714
Liked 419 Times in 96 Posts
Default Re: 1st gen Camaro bushings

Unk, Contact Alf Wiebe: wiebemetal@shaw.ca,
Greg Barsamian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2011, 09:34 AM   #8
B Aceves
Member
 
B Aceves's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 457
Likes: 1
Liked 7 Times in 4 Posts
Default Re: 1st gen Camaro bushings

Since they are legal in stock now I would strongly recommend these adjustable tie rods and
get away from any type of heating to the Spindle for Bump Steer adjustment.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	tie rod.jpg
Views:	316
Size:	5.0 KB
ID:	6666  
__________________
Bob Aceves,
746 E/SA
A&M motorsports
B Aceves is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2011, 08:37 PM   #9
3860
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: 1st gen Camaro bushings

The extended upper ball joints help to correct the camber curve, so that the amount of camber change during front end travel is reduced.

Sorry to drag this old thread back up. I am having the issue with the camber change with front end travel. Does anyone know the part number or source for the extended upper ball joints? Thanks

BTW it's a 67 Camaro
3860 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2011, 12:47 PM   #10
jrod2sc
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: 1st gen Camaro bushings

Alan,

How do you determine which available stud length works best with the extened upper ball joints (my particular set up is for a '68 Camaro)?

Just by looking at Howe's website, there are a few stud length options to choose from.

http://www.howeracing.com/p-7926-how...oog-k5108.aspx

Many Thanks.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Roehrich View Post
The extended upper ball joints help to correct the camber curve, so that the amount of camber change during front end travel is reduced.
jrod2sc is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.