|
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 16
Likes: 2
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Have the chassis rules been loosened in stock Elim. I see a number of cars, especially 66-67 Novas, with tires I am sure do not fit in stock wheel wells?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: N.S. CANADA
Posts: 498
Likes: 158
Liked 68 Times in 41 Posts
|
![]()
nope
__________________
1231 FS/D Drag Pak 1231 E/SA 71 Demon Kelly MacKay |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Derby City, USA
Posts: 3,607
Likes: 1,068
Liked 7,780 Times in 1,494 Posts
|
![]()
Ingenuity and a BFH...(Big Fricken Hammer) , was what it took to fit those 9 X 30 slicks on a 66 nova....that and the fact that I have never seen a tech man measure a rear end housing in a Stocker.....LOL....
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#4 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,782
Likes: 2,874
Liked 5,070 Times in 1,932 Posts
|
![]()
Rules haven't changed. Enforcement has.
Yes ,you can still trim the inner flange away. You can legally stretch the front and rear opening..(safety, don't ya' know), and as MJ said, some judicious work with the Ford tool on the wheel wells, has been going on forever. But I have to say , some of the stuff I've seen lately, back a generation ago, Marty Barrett, Greg X, or Wesley would have bounced you so hard and fast, your azz would be on fire. So, welcome to the new NHRA and Bracket II.
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#5 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Boulder City, Nevada 89005
Posts: 2,719
Likes: 2,765
Liked 2,425 Times in 687 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
John Irving 741 Stock 741 Super Stock |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#6 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: detroit area
Posts: 27
Likes: 9
Liked 19 Times in 5 Posts
|
![]()
Who cares ? put your dial in on the window and have at it
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,479
Likes: 3,574
Liked 7,633 Times in 1,724 Posts
|
![]()
Yo Ken, can't we have a Don't Like button?
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS I'm OK..........it's everybody else. |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 878
Likes: 196
Liked 306 Times in 172 Posts
|
![]()
I think you might care when after you push the rules too far and finally a Tech guy bounces you. Then of course you would be pissed and tell everyone how much of a prick he was to you when after all he is just doing is job. Reminds me of when almost every SS Hemi guy had the sides of their blocks machined off for weight savings and almost never got to run at Indy.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Woodburn, Or
Posts: 679
Likes: 77
Liked 786 Times in 240 Posts
|
![]()
More of an SS thing but have you noticed how low to the ground some of the SS cars are when you know that the driveshaft tunnel and frame area over the rearend wouldn't remotely allow it? There were photos on Class Racer in the build section a while back of a car being built that clearly showed those area being replaced with new fabricated sheet metal. I thought it was a nostalgia car (not a legal SS chassis) so shrugged it off, it showed up as a legal SS car not long after that and even won best engineered car, go figure.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: TN
Posts: 530
Likes: 414
Liked 242 Times in 81 Posts
|
![]()
I have seen several "STOCKERS" with mini tubs and moved springs.
__________________
Rod Greene Real men shift for them selves. Slowly working on TA Challenger for D,E/S and a 72 Challenger for SS/K, L as if I don't have enough other projects. |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|