CLASS RACER FORUM - View Single Post

Mark Yacavone · 11-26-2007, 03:14 AM

Jim, First of all, I was talking about the "rules committee " whoever that is. I talked to Bruce at Vegas and he said he would try to get the stickshift business clarified and separated from the automatic ruling. Apparently ,they went out on a coffee break , instead of dealing with it.
Now as far as me cheating, I've had linelocks and two steps on the same switch since 1993, with the wiring all laid out in plain sight. No one ever said a thing about it, or even looked at it, for that matter.
I just re-read section 8.2 of the general regs, and I can't see where my deal is illegal .
It says ' one splice is permitted from the two step to the solenoid (i.e. between the switch and solenoid"
anyone want to guess what the hell that means?
We are not talking about IHRA here ,either, (nearest track, 1000 miles)

11-26-2007, 03:14 AM	#16
Mark Yacavone Veteran Member Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Miles From Nowhere Posts: 7,417 Likes: 2,582 Liked 4,453 Times in 1,694 Posts	Re: Does this make any sense? Jim, First of all, I was talking about the "rules committee " whoever that is. I talked to Bruce at Vegas and he said he would try to get the stickshift business clarified and separated from the automatic ruling. Apparently ,they went out on a coffee break , instead of dealing with it. Now as far as me cheating, I've had linelocks and two steps on the same switch since 1993, with the wiring all laid out in plain sight. No one ever said a thing about it, or even looked at it, for that matter. I just re-read section 8.2 of the general regs, and I can't see where my deal is illegal . It says ' one splice is permitted from the two step to the solenoid (i.e. between the switch and solenoid" anyone want to guess what the hell that means? We are not talking about IHRA here ,either, (nearest track, 1000 miles) __________________ We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for..... Will Rogers