CLASS RACER FORUM - View Single Post

Jim Davis · 05-03-2007, 10:50 AM

Hi Ed
My request for usage of a hydraulic cluhch/throw out bearing was turned dowy by NHRA with the following rational.

Because it provides an avenue for a potential delay device (or the perception of same) and there is no real need for it in any car that I am aware of. The tech guys are in overload enforcing the existing rules and their interpretations and we do not need to burden them any more. I participated in the decision process w.r.t. your request and support the decision. There is no need to open this can of worms and the various interpretations that could evolve from it.
This answer is from Div. 2 tech. dir. Jim Collins with the concurrence of Len Imrrogno,Jim Skelly & Eric Lowe. I understand it even though I don't like it, so I'm off designing & fabbing mechanical clutch linkage.

Jim Davis
SS/I 2448

05-03-2007, 10:50 AM	#4
Jim Davis Junior Member Join Date: May 2005 Location: Apopka,Fl. Posts: 32 Likes: 0 Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts	Hi Ed My request for usage of a hydraulic cluhch/throw out bearing was turned dowy by NHRA with the following rational. Because it provides an avenue for a potential delay device (or the perception of same) and there is no real need for it in any car that I am aware of. The tech guys are in overload enforcing the existing rules and their interpretations and we do not need to burden them any more. I participated in the decision process w.r.t. your request and support the decision. There is no need to open this can of worms and the various interpretations that could evolve from it. This answer is from Div. 2 tech. dir. Jim Collins with the concurrence of Len Imrrogno,Jim Skelly & Eric Lowe. I understand it even though I don't like it, so I'm off designing & fabbing mechanical clutch linkage. Jim Davis SS/I 2448 __________________ Jim Davis 2448 SS