CLASS RACER FORUM - View Single Post

SS3718 · 12-22-2016, 02:01 PM

I'll start by saying my opinion is likely bias because I run in FGT. The whole concept of FGT doesn't make sense to me. They've created 14 new classes for probably 5-8 cars that run these classes across the country! Then, when they did it, we all lost anywhere from .10-.25 on our indexes and not to mention the classes combined sticks and autos.

I'm sure some will argue that the HP factors are the reason for FGT. However, if you look at last years US Nationals, there were a lot of fast traditional GT cars at the top of the qualifying sheet!

Off my soap box...I agree the indexes are messed up! They were from the beginning and even more so for the new 2017 classes!

12-22-2016, 02:01 PM	#3
SS3718 Member Join Date: Sep 2006 Posts: 129 Likes: 5 Liked 27 Times in 14 Posts	Re: FGT indexes I'll start by saying my opinion is likely bias because I run in FGT. The whole concept of FGT doesn't make sense to me. They've created 14 new classes for probably 5-8 cars that run these classes across the country! Then, when they did it, we all lost anywhere from .10-.25 on our indexes and not to mention the classes combined sticks and autos. I'm sure some will argue that the HP factors are the reason for FGT. However, if you look at last years US Nationals, there were a lot of fast traditional GT cars at the top of the qualifying sheet! Off my soap box...I agree the indexes are messed up! They were from the beginning and even more so for the new 2017 classes! Last edited by SS3718; 12-22-2016 at 02:04 PM.