View Single Post
Old 03-21-2010, 07:50 PM   #16
Jared Jordan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Modesto, CA
Posts: 612
Likes: 199
Liked 534 Times in 118 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Jared Jordan
Default Re: Hosepower on monday?

Quote:
Originally Posted by magnumv8 View Post
You need to realize that Chrysler never made a true HiPo 360 until the new DRAG PAK cars were released....(Li'L RED EXPRESS doesn't count)...the 360 DRAG PAK engine specs aren't even close to any 360 built before this package was created.....


D L RAMBO.....
I DO realize that. What I fail to understand is why the two combo's are within 3 classes of one another.

Let's compare shall we?

'79 360
9:1 CR
.455" lift
Flat tappet hydraulic lifter
Thermoquad
Cast Iron heads/manifold
1.88" intake valve 1.60" exhaust valve
Rated @ 289

5.9 Magnum
11.4:1 CR
.490" lift
Hydraulic roller lifter
1000 cfm throttle body w/injection
Aluminum heads/high rise aluminum manifold
2.02" intake valve 1.60" exhaust valve
Rated @ 275

I don't fault the car owner. The Teuton family is a great bunch of people and I congratulate them on their performance. However, that being said, that car should be in C or D not in H.

NHRA missed the boat on all the new cars. I know there's a valid argument to be made for underrating a new combination, but c'mon, these things (and CJ's) aren't even CLOSE to where they should be.
__________________
Jared Jordan
9 B/SA
2024 Jeg's D7 All Star - Stock

Last edited by Jared Jordan; 03-21-2010 at 07:55 PM.
Jared Jordan is offline   Reply With Quote