Camaro/Firebird Torque arm design notes
I am beginning construction of a 1990 Firebird in IHRA Crate Motor Stock. Looking at the bolt on suspension parts, I see that most torque arms use a "energy poly bushing" at the torque arm front. My question, since this is a dedicated drag race combination, why the poly bushing? Why not some type of rod end or solid bushing? Or, is the poly so hard deflection is not an issue? I have the same question about the lower control arms, why not solid bushings?
Thanks Larry Woodfin - owner Woodfin Automotive Kilgore TX 903-985-1162 [cell] |
Re: Camaro/Firebird Torque arm design notes
Quote:
|
Re: Camaro/Firebird Torque arm design notes
Could be the reason, however, the Cal-Trac bars have rod ends. What do you think of that?
|
Re: Camaro/Firebird Torque arm design notes
also, using the S & W torque arm as an example, it has ladder bar rod ends and ladder bars adjuster at the rear attaching points. Bushing only at the front pivot.
|
Re: Camaro/Firebird Torque arm design notes
You can have heims on the torque arm. You cannot have heims on the control arms.
|
Re: Camaro/Firebird Torque arm design notes
Quote:
|
Re: Camaro/Firebird Torque arm design notes
Larry, most of these "catalogue" arms are marketed to street cars. Use large heim on foward location of arm, but it must be able to swivel front and rear. you can box the factory arms, use bearings for bushings. The critical piece is the preload device (Pete Z bars,etc) for side to side preload. Some guys also use sway bar. Use best shock you can afford with double adjustment. Joe
|
Re: Camaro/Firebird Torque arm design notes
Larry, check PM
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:01 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.