CLASS RACER FORUM

CLASS RACER FORUM (https://classracer.com/classforum/index.php)
-   Stock and Super Stock Tech (https://classracer.com/classforum/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   bellhoushing (https://classracer.com/classforum/showthread.php?t=72461)

Jim Hanig 03-12-2019 07:08 PM

bellhoushing
 
How many stick shift guys check there bellhousing alignment, how far off can it be.

Rory McNeil 03-12-2019 07:38 PM

Re: bellhoushing
 
Always check them, never had one that was dead on, or close to it, out of the box. A bit of a pain, but always a good idea to check and correct. When I get the bellhousing dialed in with offset dowel pins, I always drill and tap the block for small set screws so that the pins won`t get knocked out of position during bellhousing re & re . Obviously zero is ideal, but I try to keep it under .005".

Stephen & Horace Johnson 03-12-2019 09:41 PM

Re: bellhoushing
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jim Hanig (Post 584555)
How many stick shift guys check there bellhousing alignment, how far off can it be.

I have 2 QT's on my cars both were dead on

Nmbr1GMfan 03-12-2019 10:08 PM

Re: bellhoushing
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Stephen & Horace Johnson (Post 584593)
I have 2 QT's on my cars both were dead on

I have found QT's to be really good as well.

Rory McNeil 03-12-2019 10:10 PM

Re: bellhoushing
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Stephen & Horace Johnson (Post 584593)
I have 2 QT's on my cars both were dead on

Stephen, do you have a QuickTime in the Fairlane? If so, with what clutch? I had heard that on a FE Ford the QuickTimes were not deep enough to work with a Long style pressure plate with a 10 or 10 1/2" disc, unless you stacked up block plates to get enough room. What is your experiance with the FE?

T Ames 03-12-2019 11:43 PM

Re: bellhoushing
 
Hello Jim. Agree with Rory on being within ~.005. I like the Browell alignment tool and also the RobbMC offset dowels.

Run to Rund 03-13-2019 10:32 AM

Re: bellhoushing
 
I have had to use offset dowels and also correct in and out being off square. I use Lakewood dowels drilled and tapped 5/16 x 18 so I can remove them with a slide hammer. I have gotten some pretty bad alignments to within .001" by carefully orienting the dowels. Yes, I also have found QT to be much better than the old Lakewoods, but still the block is often not close enough.

Greg Reimer 7376 03-13-2019 02:23 PM

Re: bellhoushing
 
A machinist I knew, one of those guys who must stay up nights thinking about new ideas and stuff, took a very accurately machined,decked, squared, line honed and ready to go block, and just for something else to do, decided to check and see if the rear mating surface of the block was accurate, in this, he meant 90 degrees perpendicular to the center line of the main saddles. He put a ready to go crank in it, then a flywheel which he properly torqued, and checked for run out,it was perfect, but when he checked the distance from the rear face of the flywheel to the surface of the block, it wasn't 90 degrees from the crankshaft c/l. In other words, the bell housing flange wasn't the least bit flat, or accurately machined.Now,dealing with a cast iron block that came from the furnace and was originally machined at the OEM engine plant long before it ever was a seasoned casting, that makes sense. I remember cars when I worked in dealers in the mid-late '70s once in a while you would get one with a cracked flex plate. If it's absorbing run out every revolution,how long can you expect it to last? You 4 speed racers, and I love seeing them, trying to get an accurate result using offset dowel pins and God knows what else it might take to achieve an accurate result from a hydroformed or stamped part like that scatter shield,could have a whole host of inaccuracies to deal with. In short, has anybody ever had clutch and flywheel issues due to inaccurate machining of the rear face of the block on back? I'll bet we have,and don't know it!!

Dwight Southerland 03-13-2019 03:27 PM

Re: bellhoushing
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Greg Reimer 7376 (Post 584648)
. . . In other words, the bell housing flange wasn't the least bit flat, or accurately machined.. . .

X2!

Jim Caughlin 03-13-2019 03:27 PM

Re: bellhoushing
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Greg Reimer 7376 (Post 584648)
A machinist I knew, one of those guys who must stay up nights thinking about new ideas and stuff, took a very accurately machined,decked, squared, line honed and ready to go block, and just for something else to do, decided to check and see if the rear mating surface of the block was accurate, in this, he meant 90 degrees perpendicular to the center line of the main saddles. He put a ready to go crank in it, then a flywheel which he properly torqued, and checked for run out,it was perfect, but when he checked the distance from the rear face of the flywheel to the surface of the block, it wasn't 90 degrees from the crankshaft c/l. In other words, the bell housing flange wasn't the least bit flat, or accurately machined.Now,dealing with a cast iron block that came from the furnace and was originally machined at the OEM engine plant long before it ever was a seasoned casting, that makes sense. I remember cars when I worked in dealers in the mid-late '70s once in a while you would get one with a cracked flex plate. If it's absorbing run out every revolution,how long can you expect it to last? You 4 speed racers, and I love seeing them, trying to get an accurate result using offset dowel pins and God knows what else it might take to achieve an accurate result from a hydroformed or stamped part like that scatter shield,could have a whole host of inaccuracies to deal with. In short, has anybody ever had clutch and flywheel issues due to inaccurate machining of the rear face of the block on back? I'll bet we have,and don't know it!!

Totally correct, you have to check for parallel before you start checking for run out, I've seen this problem also.

On another note regarding Quicktime, thank you very much for changing the flange bolt pattern and not saying anything. I use a small block Ford bellhousing from Quicktime which bolts to an adapter plate (that I fabricated) to fit my 2.3 Ford motor. I bought a new 'duplicate' bellhousing from them last year and the entire flange arrangement had been changed. I had to rework my adapter plate along with the chassis cross member to make everything fit. As a general rule, I like the Quicktime quality but sure wasn't happy about the unnecessary redesign. Also, their prices went through the roof when they got bought out a few years back.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:27 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.