Re: Crankcase Ventilation
Quote:
Anyhow, I thought about that after I posted that. Our car was a '71, so I guess it wouldn't have been legal, either. |
Re: Crankcase Ventilation
Quote:
Yes, yes it's all comming back to me now ! Was that for the single ring piston that was being experimented with. I believe one of my friends went to a Manley seminar back then and thought this new style ring ,piston combination was going to be " to die for" ed |
Re: Crankcase Ventilation
Quote:
|
Re: Crankcase Ventilation
Quote:
|
Re: Crankcase Ventilation
Quote:
It's ironic though, the stuff that's allowed these days, and you show up with a draft tube and yer out! |
Re: Crankcase Ventilation
Quote:
|
Re: Crankcase Ventilation
I have tried several theories at the track and confirmed some of them on the dyno. Brake booster valves are not created equal. There is dyno proven power here if you work for it. Mine will suck the bottom of the pan up against the pickup. You have to "release" the vacuum for the oil to drain. Then you'll know your close!
Wade |
Re: Crankcase Ventilation
would love to have some feed back or "hint" on the correct brake booster check valve!!!!......late 60's???.....early 70's????......I need this junky 275hp 327 of mine to pick up!!!!:D:confused:
|
Re: Crankcase Ventilation
The brake booster valve I'm using is a 1970 GM version. It just allows air to go in one direction. I don't know why one would be more beneficial than another, but I'll look into it.
|
Re: Crankcase Ventilation
i think your refering to a check valve that is screwed into your header.......brakebooster check valve is plastic and similar to a PCV valve in size
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:29 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.