CLASS RACER FORUM

CLASS RACER FORUM (https://classracer.com/classforum/index.php)
-   Stock and Super Stock (https://classracer.com/classforum/forumdisplay.php?f=3)
-   -   Crate Motor Class (https://classracer.com/classforum/showthread.php?t=15088)

j gardiner 12-04-2017 12:41 PM

Re: Crate Motor Class
 
We need to install a like button

Chris1529 12-04-2017 12:51 PM

Re: Crate Motor Class
 
Correct me if I am wrong, but aren't the factory stock guys allowed to put a different year engine in their cars now? How is that not the same as "Stock GT".

GUMP 12-04-2017 01:04 PM

Re: Crate Motor Class
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris1529 (Post 550992)
Correct me if I am wrong, but aren't the factory stock guys allowed to put a different year engine in their cars now? How is that not the same as "Stock GT".

Only for the Showdown. My understanding is that they will not be able to run in this configuration in Stock Eliminator.

Todd Hoven 12-04-2017 01:08 PM

Re: Crate Motor Class
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris1529 (Post 550992)
Correct me if I am wrong, but aren't the factory stock guys allowed to put a different year engine in their cars now? How is that not the same as "Stock GT".

Only for the shootout races. No longer a part of stock.

Dan Fahey 12-04-2017 04:03 PM

Re: Crate Motor Class
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Michael Beard (Post 550980)
They love crate motor cars, as long as they cost over $100K.

Yeah this Thread is like the Class Racer Vs Bracket Racer post.
Giving you grief with nonsense comments.

You made a comment about spending what you could to race.
To race people have to make sensible choices.

Pure Stock was a cost effective way for many to get back to racing Stock.
CM was a cost effective way to use current similar available engines.
GT was a cost effective way to use existing Engines in a similar body.
NHRA SS does it...but not Stock.
All affordable solutions or upgrades.

d

Todd Hoven 12-04-2017 05:20 PM

Re: Crate Motor Class
 
If those classes are so good for the sport why was the participation so low? Why is the IHRA out of business?

Petition the IHRA to carry your classes in a big bracket only forum. Run it as a big combo. Cheap and fun for everyone. Why would they say no? You guys as racers take care of tech. Everyone wins.

The NHRA has too many classes in stock. We should go to 1 pound breaks and combine sticks and auto’s if they won’t do that, no reason to ask for anything else.




Quote:

Originally Posted by Dan Fahey (Post 551011)
Yeah this Thread is like the Class Racer Vs Bracket Racer post.
Giving you grief with nonsense comments.

You made a comment about spending what you could to race.
To race people have to make sensible choices.

Pure Stock was a cost effective way for many to get back to racing Stock.
CM was a cost effective way to use current similar available engines.
GT was a cost effective way to use existing Engines in a similar body.
NHRA SS does it...but not Stock.
All affordable solutions or upgrades.

d


Dan Fahey 12-04-2017 05:25 PM

Re: Crate Motor Class
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Todd Hoven (Post 551022)
If those classes are so good for the sport why was the participation so low? Why is the IHRA out of business?

Petition the IHRA to carry your classes in a big bracket only forum. Run it as a big combo. Cheap and fun for everyone. Why would they say no? You guys as racers take care of tech. Everyone wins.

The NHRA has too many classes in stock. We should go to 1 pound breaks and combine sticks and auto’s if they won’t do that, no reason to ask for anything else.

Todd;
You asked a "why" question that was answered dozens of time.
If NHRA had too many classes how come they added FS?
What do you mean by too many classes?
Who determines that number?
What have you done to petition NHRA?

Nobody complained there were too many classes with FS?

Nmbr1GMfan 12-04-2017 06:08 PM

Re: Crate Motor Class
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Todd Hoven (Post 551022)
The NHRA has too many classes in stock. We should go to 1 pound breaks and combine sticks and auto’s if they won’t do that, no reason to ask for anything else.

I would also like to know what this means, what exactly constitutes "too many classes"? How would a race weekend be better with the classes as you have described?

Billy Nees 12-04-2017 06:08 PM

Re: Crate Motor Class
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dan Fahey (Post 551011)
Pure Stock was a cost effective way for many to get back to racing Stock.

Dan! No, it's not! There is no such thing as a "cost effective way of racing Stock" or Brackets or slot cars or turtles!
Anybody else? I'm on a roll.

Todd Hoven 12-04-2017 06:12 PM

Re: Crate Motor Class
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dan Fahey (Post 551023)
Todd;
You asked a "why" question that was answered dozens of time.
If NHRA had too many classes how come they added FS?
What do you mean by too many classes?
Who determines that number?
What have you done to petition NHRA?

Nobody complained there were too many classes with FS?

FS classes added more excitement and factory interest. It was a change to bring some excitement into a class that hadn’t changed in years. The new heads up XX class was born from it.

I mean less car classes for more heads up racing. I’m not sure who determines it. Just my opinion.

I don’t have to petition NHRA: I have a car that fits in a class they run.

Other then the guys that lost a place to race nobody is asking NHRA to add more classes.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:01 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.