Re: been told too many things bout this combo...
there are no differences in the block and such, the only difference is its in a SVO vs a non SVO.
|
Re: been told too many things bout this combo...
Quote:
|
Re: been told too many things bout this combo...
The SVO was merely a more European (if you will) looking Mustang. They had 5 lug wheels, bigger brakes, different fascia, heavier sway bars, different steering wheel etc. I believe the engine was the same as the earlier turbo 4 cars. The 20th anniversary 84 GT350 I run was available from Ford with the turbo 4.
(mine was originally a CFI 5.0) My car has some of the same chassis componets as an SVO. I put a ball joint on it 2 months ago and asked for a ball joint for an 84 Mustang GT. It would not fit. I went back and asked for an SVO ball joint and wallah, it fit. SVO's were not coupes, but that doesn't matter if you want to run it in SS/DX. As long as the engine corporate relationship is the same,it makes no difference. You could run a Mercury engine in it if you wanted. Doesn't matter the year or HP. SS/DX is classed by cu inch to weight. You could run that motor in an old Fiesta or a pinto if you wanted as long as the car's weight divided by cu inches was 15.00 or greater. Hellraising racer, I think you need to go to some races and look through the pits at the way stockers/superstockers are built. They are by no means entry level classes. I wouldn't even call IHRA pure stock an entry level class. You would have easily have a couple thousand dollars in a T-5 transmission by the time you bought a rebuild kit, a shifter, straight cut gears, and good clutch set up. You may even want to go to a Fun Ford Weekend to look at those various cars as well. Some meets have SVO clubs there meeting there as well. |
Re: been told too many things bout this combo...
I cant run it as a SVO because of the hatch notch problem, BUT i did do some digging and calling, 1979-83 coupes did come with a non intercooled turbo motor that i can run in stock class and super stock, i just have to change my front end and tail lights.
|
Re: been told too many things bout this combo...
Quote:
http://classracer.com/classforum/showthread.php?t=10722 |
Re: been told too many things bout this combo...
I suggest you build an 80 turbo mustang and race it in u-v/s or /sa. Your superstock idea is not a great one. I believe the record holder (in u-v stock) stated that he can run around 2 seconds under the index. Read the rule book a few more times and you'll understand the questions you have a little more.
|
Re: been told too many things bout this combo...
I don't know about anyone else, but I am confused as to exactly what you want to build.
You are talking about so many different combinations that they have all run together. |
Re: been told too many things bout this combo...
Hey Chris1529, the SVO Mustang 84-86 has a built in lower ball joint from the factory. I know I've taken one apart and they are not replaceable. Going to have to machine it out and put in a repaceable one from a different vehicle.
|
Re: been told too many things bout this combo...
I thought my ball joints were that way too according to the shop manual, but it pressed out.
I had to ask for an SVO ball joint at Advance Auto. It was about 3/16" larger than one for a regular GT. |
Re: been told too many things bout this combo...
Quote:
(specifically, a white one!) He needs to make his an 83 and run P or Q/Stock. He could convert it to SS later ,if he hadn't spent enough money yet. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:10 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.