Re: MT vs Hoosier Small Tire
Quote:
Quote:
I guess kind of where I'm at, is a situation where I really don't know the condition of these used tires I've got, so I don't know if they'll be good representations of a new set. At the same time, do I get a third set of wheels and take them all to the track and do a/b/c comparison runs, or do I say "I know these 3754s are way too tricky, let's unmount them and put the 3060R on". Unfortunately, I don't have a tire machine, so any changes costs more money. Although I guess in the big picture, all R&D costs some amount of money. On that same note, I'm having to weigh out section width versus wheel backspace. I have about an inch and a quarter from the leaf spring to the sidewall right now at 5.5 inches of backspace, so either the Hoosier or the 3060 I'm going to lose a half inch of that clearance. If I go to the Hoosier 30x10.5, I definitely have to go to a 4.5 backspace. With my weight I don't think I really need a 30x10.5 tire, it would definitely be a little more forgiving. But for stuff where I don't need that dot stamped tire, I'm trying to decide which way I want to go - short and wide, or tall and skinny. |
Re: MT vs Hoosier Small Tire
Quote:
I lot of the higher HP Stockers are way faster than that on the above tires. We have found very little difference in ET between Goodyears and Hoosiers the last several years. Years ago, the Goodyears tended to not recover from wheel spin very well. However, Goodyear seems to have gotten a handle on that since that time. |
Re: MT vs Hoosier Small Tire
If you are going to run Super Street, keep in mind that you will be first out in the morning. I would highly suggest running a bias-ply slick as it will be more forgiving. In Division 2, it is hit-or-miss on what kind of track you are going to get from the NHRA early in the AM (and late in the rounds). A lot of Stockers are running a bunch of weight to compensate for this.
|
Re: MT vs Hoosier Small Tire
He’s already running a bunch of weight :D with a car and a combo that will not be competitive in S/ST.
|
Re: MT vs Hoosier Small Tire
Quote:
I also wouldn't count anyone out just based on opinions. There are some people out there that will flat out murder you in anything. I will throw Fletcher out there as an example. |
Re: MT vs Hoosier Small Tire
This guy ain’t that guy and my advice to him is spot on and the TRUTH! He’d get the same advice from anyone running the class that’s being honest, I will throw Keith Mayers out there as an example.
|
Re: MT vs Hoosier Small Tire
I would always suggest running a radial tire if your car works. If it doesn't work, make it work.
In your case, I would suggest a 28 x 10.5 bracket radial, either PBR (Mickey) or DBR (Hoosier). |
Re: MT vs Hoosier Small Tire
Quote:
|
Re: MT vs Hoosier Small Tire
After reading your original post again, the first thing I would do is mount up the 30 x 9 radials you already own and try them. I ran brackets and S/ST for 20 years on those tires (30 x 9 Stocker radials, but not Mickeys) before switching to bracket radials 4-5 years ago.
|
Re: MT vs Hoosier Small Tire
I agree with Tony!
I run a ProCharged SBC with EFI @ 3100 lbs. We have run S/ST, but not with this combo & the car is primarily a bracket car. We have a glide with a 1.76 1st gear & launch @3400 with around 3 lbs. of boost. The car 60's in the high 1.20s. We have raced on pretty much all the Hoosier 30x9 radials, C06, C07 & C30 compounds in both standard & lightweight. We also run the M/T Pro Bracket Radial 30x10.5. The M/T is our favorite radial, but the Hoosiers are a very close 2nd. The Hoosier below in yellow & we have limited runs on them. They seem to work well & provide a very aggressive bite on the starting line. 1700/781L :) https://i.imgur.com/Udl6Hcb.png |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:35 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.