Re: Mounting weight in car?
 

HHMMM...
I realize that I know almost nothing... but
but
SOMEBODY has to ask this
! ! !
Why the dedication to making the car so much heavier ? ? ?
How I see it
A station wagon, by it's very design, already has a weight transfer advantage.
Obviously, the lighter car is faster.
The lighter car is easier on chassis parts... and even the body, if the intended added weight isn't in the form of structural improvement.

Why not go up a class ?
Besides, faster is funner !

just say'n

Re: Mounting weight in car?
 

Good question. Now here's the answer :

First of all , a lot of racers don't pay any attention to the lower Stock classes. They do indeed ,think faster is funner ( and much more expensive..MY) Also ,they're convinced they can't win much , without being a chaser, running in the 10's. However, the fact remains, you have to hit the tree and run close, if you ever want to win anything, without relying on luck.

Okay..On to the answer.

T/SA index ,14.40 @19 lbs. per.

U/SA index , 14.85 @ 20 per.
Difference , .45 seconds.

At 204 hp, to go from 19 to 20 lbs. per, that is the amount of weight you would add.

You can probably extrapolate it from there.

Re: Mounting weight in car?
 

To run T I need to be 4103 lb.
To run U I need to be 4310 lb
Currently the car with driver and 3 gallons of gas is 3880 lb.
Yes a wagon will have good weight transfer but I need to meet minimum weight to fit in class. With the extra weight in the rear it will really transfer.

Re: Mounting weight in car?
 

Ah yes, I didn't realize that about T / U .
Makes sense now.